Monday, November 30, 2009

Found some 'Kinda' escape in 'Saint Jack'

The National Museum Cinematheque woos its followers with something of a more fetishish nature this time. It features 'Once Upon a Time' old films that give you a peek into facets of Singapore that are lost. These movies from its' Once Upon a Time in the Orient' series feature mainly films that were shot on location in Singapore and most, Singapore itself is an essential character in the story.

'Saint Jack' the opening film, packs the most these festishish finds. Made in 1979, while navigating through the story, you find yourself playing 'spot the location' from its scratchy 35mm film footage. In 'Saint Jack', Chinatown is teeming with street stalls and 'Ah Ma's in samfoos and people are still living on stilts where the waterside bars of Clarke Quay are today. Perhaps Jack Flowers, the lead character, would have changed his trade to gambling if he could envision that one day the 3 IR towers would loom over the bumboat-strewn Clifford Pier. For the 80s kids like myself, the ubiquitous cane furniture tingled my sense of nostalgia.
But nostalgia does not quite nail down the aura of the film. Other than the Chinese songs that wafted through the grimy Chinatown streets and the fitted bell-bottoms with awkwardly-high waistlines, the film portrays a Singapore actually quite unfamililar to many. 'Saint Jack' follows a hustler named Jack Flowers who dallies with loads of women and even more men. He is the white male visitor's guide to finding sexual outlets in Singapore. He is Ang Moh (as they used the term to his annoyance) but has struck a common chord with the locals. The only people who are out to make his life difficult are the triad gangs. The usually efficient Singapore police seem not much of an obstruction. I mean, how could a shuttle bus for whore-activities not invite any raids? So indeed, the Singapore seen through Jack's adventures is a hot bed of vice, dubious trades and women whose jobs are primarily to please men.
According to Ben Slater in his introduction to the film, the producers rather naively sent a copy of the film to the Singapore censors in 1979 in hope of releasing it it the local cinemas. The film was banned. While the rationale for the decision is obvious, I am more interested in the truth behind what's been portrayed. Tan Pin Pin's 'Invisible City' unearths the flip side of common history for us. We hear history as it is told by the plebians rather than history books that bear the authorities' stamp of approval. 'Saint Jack', as many would say is a white man's gaze or even a Hollywood gaze of Singapore in the messy 70s. But perhaps, it could also be read like a third-party gaze. So has Singappore really been misrepresented? I am in no position to answer since I have not lived through the 70s. Many of the young film appreciators in the audience similarly are likely to only be able to marvel at a Singapore more unique than 'Unique' as STB defines it today.

I am inclined to believe these things happened because the film displayed a lot of 'earthy' knowledge of social behaviour and nuances. It did not really explain what an Ang Moh translated to. It had a pretty 'candid' scene in which the hookers were chilling out in the house and one of them crooned to a popular Mandarin tune. The striptease act was so 'makeshift' and was performed in a space that resembled your HDB bedroom. It does show that the director's knowledge of Singapore goes beyond the Singapore Sling and the Raffles Hotel. But if the film still looks alien, perhaps it's a not just a 'white man's gaze', it's a 'white man's gaze at a anomalous blotch on the social fabric'. A peek at a sub-culture.
When the movie ended, the key cast and crew members were asked to come down to the stage for a Q & A session. This point of the evening attracted a lot of eager gazes, some were unforgiving too. There was a sense of 'This is how I will look 30 years from now' as our eyes swept across varicose veins, balding heads and love handles. Among the cast, you could feel how the audacity of the project had united them. This film had to be shot under the name of 'Jack of Hearts' and a false synopsis was given to the authorities to allow the filming to be carried out smoothly. The only pity was a few of the more remarkable characters were not present, including Ben Ghazarra, the lead.
Spending time in the theatre watching 'Saint Jack' took me away from depressing HDB enclosures and formulaic shopping malls, overrespresented in local films. Discussing shooting difficulties of the 70s provided a respite from the typical current industry issues concerning we have discussed to tedium. But was it just an escape, a fetish-fulfilling cinematic experience? Certainly more than that. Watching it was a benchmark-shifting exercise. Long before Roystan Tan featured lean young boys in homoerotic encounters or Kan Lume featured carnal acts between women, there is Saint Jack. I now know someone's 'reached the moon' way before us in 1979.
Check out these Saint Jack links:

Kinda Hot Blog (by the author of 'Kinda Hot' (on the making of Saint Jack) Ben Slater)


Thursday, November 26, 2009

bener2 beruntung gan!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BO2rW1alVv8endofvid
[starttext][endtext]

Pembawa Berita Captured Pegang2 Payudara

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28cH4x_vrEIendofvid
[starttext]Kurang profesional nih kayaknya....[endtext]

Girl KO's guy in one punch

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAx5cLTJ3Ekendofvid
[starttext] Pasti sakit banget...[endtext]

Membuat Ayam Jadi Patung

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6J4sXL5UFJ4endofvid
[starttext][endtext]

Membuat Ayam Tidur Cara Gokil

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1r9QWtlLOdcendofvid
[starttext] [endtext]

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

LUNCHBOX 2 - Chai Yee Wei

Yee Wei sips his Coke Zero while he awaits to find what we have packed into his Lunchbox.
Friday 31 July, 8pm
Esplanade Library/Mrs Fields Cafe

Jeremy starts off by explaining the raison d'etre of LUNCHBOX that it wants to explore what goes on behind the great minds of filmmakers and gets a violent reaction from Yee Wei

Yee Wei: Great mind! Please. You make me look like an obnoxious asshole. Haha.

Before we even get onto our first question, Yee Wei goes off-tangent onto talking about his idol Michael Jackson until Jeremy interrupts to say he is here for ‘quality control’ so we were all knocked back on track. Then Yee Wei sees the word childhood photo on our scrapbook under ‘requests’ and starts off in another thread of his own again!

When I was in primary school, I frequently took part in Chinese storytelling competitions. And the funny thing is I also got 2nd Prize. That’s because I was very unconventional. I liked to add special effects and sounds to my storytelling. I guess it does not go down well with the usual scoring criteria. But my teacher liked me for that and often sent me for inter-school competitions. But I still like watching people’s reactions I entertain them, whether they are laughing or they get scared when I tell them ghost stories. I remember telling the story of ‘The 3 Little Pigs’ and I would start off with ‘Kok Kok Kok Kei!

Assertive waitress (bordering on rude) interrupts our conversation as she served the tea. Our eyes roll for a moment.

Then when I reached primary 4, I started feeling more self-conscious. I don’t know why I started feeling so self-conscious, getting stage fright and all. I stopped telling stories. Then in secondary school, the entertaining people thingey in me came back so I joined the CLDDS which stands for er… er…. What’s that?Jeremy: Chinese Language Drama and Dance Society.

Elfe: Very long.

I did Chinese sword dance and then I was in choir for 3 years. Got to travel. I really enjoyed those days. Then when I joined the AVA Club, we did our first Orientation video using video cassettes! So those days very happy days for me. I did not do well in my studies in school so I have fond memories of these activities!

(pause)

I have always been a Cheeena boy. I didn’t speak English until I went to junior college. Though I was aware it was not hip to be so Cheeena and listen to 933 FM. Then I went to CJ (Catholic Junior College), everyone spoke English there. They were all from CHIJ Toa Payoh, SJI, all English speaking! So I had to force myself to start speaking English. And I had a girlfriend who doesn’t speak Mandarin. And I realized on thing, if your English sucks, then all your other subjects will suffer because everything else is taught in English. I really struggled all the way until I reached Uni.

Not afraid of 'hairy' issues
What’s the funniest rumour or remark about you?
I was pretty low-profile. I was a pretty ugly boy. Nobody cared about me (laughs). Though my girlfriend was pretty cute!
Any hobbies besides filming?

Yah I like Karaoke. I love singing. I like photography. Oh yeah, I do wedding videos. (Pause) Actually I didn’t think of becoming a filmmaker when I was younger because I am a typical Singapore. I am not even a film-major la. I am a business major. I wanted to do film only 3 or 4 years ago. You can call it an epiphany. I was 29 turning 30. (there he goes side-tracking again) You know, my family has always been doing business doing business so I naturally thought of pursuing a business path. CJC had accountancy. But I did badly. Then I ended up in the ‘scholar platoon in the army. In all 160 of them in the platoon, I was the only one who did not make it to University. I remember the day we went to collect our A level results, we took the RPL (topless boat) back to Singapore from Pulau Tekong. The scholars all around me were complaining how many As they missed getting and I was miles apart from them. And they still asked me ‘Are you ok? How did you do?’ So I said ‘2 A’. They said ‘not bad’. Then I said ‘2 A level pass la’.

Someone turned off the lights on Yee Wei.

But later on, things got better. I went on to do my TOEFL in army and then entered University of Michigan. I studied very hard then. But that was not enough. I was being assessed even for my participation in class. There was definitely a change in pace. But I liked it. Those were the happiest times of my life. But towards the end, I started to fear again cos this is it… no more school holidays, no more skipping of school, no more chao keng…. this is the real world. So that was really an interesting juncture in time. Then I would say the other juncture is when you have a mid-life crisis.

I started a business, failed in it, went to work, saved enough, came back and did another business which is the current ‘Curry Favour’ restaurant. This business did eventually get profitable. But something was still wrong – I was still not happy. So I started questioning myself why. While all these were happening, I had already been doing wedding videos at the side and for fun. I started asking myself why can’t I extend this interest of mine, So 3-4 years ago, I started making short films. One thing led to another. And now ‘Blood Ties’.

Proud father of his baby 'Blood Ties'

Anyway, would you starve for art?

Cannot la. You need to find a middle way. Look at Buddha, he starved, starved, starved himself in order to find out the meaning of suffering. But he soon realized h could not do this because he would starved himself to death and not learnt anything. One day, he was meditating and still starving, he realized someone was pulling a boat with a rope. If pulled too tight, the rope will snap, if too loose, the boat will float away. So, the middle way is the key. So he realized the important thing is to keep himself in the right state, right mind in order to achieve what he really wanted and be able to focus clearly on your goals. It is certainly not true, that if I don’t starve, I will make very lousy art.

Yee Wei marvels at the kiddy grub we packed into his lunchbox.

Will I work for my art? Yes. Will I starve for my art? I would say not very wise.

We adjourn to Mrs Fields Cafe, also in the same building as the library was closing. Yee Wei goes on to share some unforgettable moments from his work as a wedding videographer.

There was a couple. The husband’s mother had Alzheimer. But the wife accepted the family. You can tell that he is very grateful that his wife do not question. One of the most memorable moments was when he entered the room to receive the bride who was waiting by the bed he got down on his knees and took out a lyric sheet and sang the song ‘The Young Ones’. And when he sang the verse ‘to live and to love, while the flame is strong, for we may not be the very young ones very long’ the whole wedding had a different level of meaning to me. It was very emotional. That was one of the most touching moment.

There was another couple that I shot. Everyone else wasn’t happy that they were getting married. The bride was probably in her late forties. The groom was probably in his late thirties. I had a feeling that the groom might be younger than the bride. There were three other eighteen to nineteen year old kids who were actually the son and two daughters of the bride. One of the daughter was very displeased with the wedding. Over at the groom’s, his eighty year old mother was up since five in the morning doing all the preparation while four of her elder sons did nothing to help. They even came late because they couldn’t be bothered and you can tell why the mother loves the groom more than the others. After I shot their wedding the boyfriend of one of the bride’s daughters came up to me and was grateful that I shot all the happy moments in the wedding because he said it mattered most to the bride and groom knowing that everyone else was against their wedding yet they went through all the odds to make it happen. When you see that kind of tension in the family and how much they still are together it makes you realize how strong their relationship is.

These are all stories that interest me. As a filmmaker you get moved and interested in stories like that. You don’t know what the guy over there is reading but there’s probably a story behind it. Those stories that I’m most interested in are those from people that are seen as underdogs. For example, it was past midnight, I saw an aunty selling tissues at a kopitiam. I asked her to sit with me to have chitchat. She was very puzzled. I asked her why is she doing this and where are her children. At that moment, she told me no and not to let her children know.

From that statement you know that she doesn’t really need to do this and that she is only doing it for self-worth. She didn’t want her children to know so as not to shame them. It reaches into something very human about it just by that one statement she made. You can start extrapolating what is behind her story. You can imagine how her son is like, how she probably is and living that kind of life. It doesn’t have to be a woman selling her body. This is a similar double-life story and I’m surprise that no one has done a story or a documentary about these aunties. None of our filmmakers are covering things like these. Why? We are covering things that are petty and not so important. I always question why are we not reflecting more of our lives.

Do you reckon that most filmmakers, half the time, they try to be more original than the other, that’s why they don’t want to submerge into these everyday people?

I don’t think its not because they don’t want to. I think it’s simply because of age. It’s not an important thing that they see or affect their lives at this moment. You can tell that things are starting to change. Young filmmakers produce films that are closest to their hearts - things that affects them directly. In their films you can find typical lines like What about me? You can find this line in a lot of Singapore’s short films. We are still at our infancy of our film industry. It has been neglected for way too long and we’re just starting up now, all trying to play catch up. We don’t even know what is a Singapore film. We look at Korean films – the way they dress, their architecture, you know it’s Korean as well as Japan, Hong Kong, China and Malaysia – are all distinguishable. Singapore doesn’t really have that “Singapore look” yet. We are still searching for that. although, ‘881’ does have a very ‘Singaporean look’ to it. Jack Neo’s films reflect our society a lot and that is why his film sells because local people see themselves in it. As much as local filmmakers like to dismiss it for artistic reasons, you can’t deny that a lot of his films reflect the common Singaporean.

To be honest, I am a Jack Neo fan. Maybe as a filmmaker he does not have the traditional training and that is why his films does not have those taste. He hasn’t been train as a filmmaker. His strength is his dialogue. Hi story-telling skills may be all over the place but he has very good dialogues. People can relate very well to his films. He is part of Singapore film history. Royston has his own style so does Jack Neo. Royston’s films have high aesthetics and visual design. Eric Khoo is very strong in his ‘moments’. He is able to capture very intimate moments and allow people to ponder on it.

Is it true that many filmmakers have some kind of obssessive fixation on certain films that they would watch it over and again? (Read an interview in which Royston watched Rule #1 several times)

What is an important essence that you need to have in your film?

Other than feeling entertained I do hope viewers leave the cinema with questions. If people do leave with questions pertaining to things in general or the things that I reflect in the film, thatn I would have achieved my goal. I am a curious person and love to ask questions but in our society we don’t ask too much questions. But through films I am able to raise those questions. I think, as a filmmaker, it is my responsibility to reflect the time that I am living in now. I don’t have to do it directly. I can sugar coat the issue but not address them directly.

It’s all about expressing one’s thoughts or opinions though a medium. Books, music, writing poetry – it’s just a different way of expressing themselves. For example, maybe your uncles and aunties might express themselves through karaoke? It’s a way of expressing themselves.

I know you did a short film called Lao Sai. Captivating title. Tell us about it!

It’s very stupid. We spent $300. It was Vesak Day, I grabbed five of my friends, we rece the toilet around our place. We went to the shopping mall, haven’t started shooting the security guard came. I went down to look for the Supervisor and bribed him with $50. He told me we’ve got half an hour. We quickly shot and left. Had chicken rice and went for a spa after that. We actually got a boom mic but we realized that the mic wasn’t on when we watched the tapes. So the audio was like shit. My friends and I we acted in it. We won cash vouchers. After that we joined Fly By Night and won Merit award. Subsequently I made two more short films, which was just for practice I don’t show it to anyone. Then finally, I made a short film to see if the concept can be made into a full-fledged film. One of the mentors whom I chose as a mentor that I did not approach for help, watched it and wanted to go for the idea.

Yee Wei is one of the most prolific filmmakers in Singapore, having made several shorts which include Lao Sai, Blood Ties (short film) and My Blue Heaven. Blood Ties was his first feature film that has already ended its run. But I bet you can watch out for the DVD soon!
Learn more about Blood Ties here.

Monday, November 16, 2009

'Autumn in March' & my attempt to sell you a DVD at $18

Yet another local film walks on the tight rope that separates commercial from arthouse. You know it never pays. Yet this is so much the dream of many first-time filmmakers – to want to make a film that has a following and yet stay true to their artistic integrity. Very few people would classify Huang Yi Liang, a TV veteran as arthouse. His place on commercial TV is as sturdy as a fortress. But take note, on the Dvd cover of ‘Autumn In March’, he is known as Ng Aik Leong, a name that shouts ‘serious artist’ more than the brash ‘Huang Yi Liang’.

‘Autumn In March’ goes down easy on the average palate. It has a discernible plot that even hooks you on mildly. It has seasoned TV actors who have passed the basic screen tests. It is shot professionally on film, so no issues on grainy shots, shaky camerawork and distorted colouring. It has all the commercial ingredients in place except that it’s got some arthouse touches on editing. So why are cinemas not picking it up?

Here is my little two cents worth that hopefully make you part with $18 just to support our budding actor-turned-director. The film belongs to a bit of a thriller-mystery type genre, with horror overtones. A mysterious girl, complete with a freaky-kooky bowl-shaped haircut is looking for tenants for the big bungalow which she occupies alone. At her asking price is out-of-this-world – S$200 a month. Like the princess who never laughed, batches after batches of keen up-takers are literally shooed away because they do not pass her screening. Then, almost miraculously, her chosen 3 tenants turn up at the same time. They include a career lady (Phyllis Quek), a young pianist (Nathaniel Ho) and an ex-convict (Bernard Tan). Their common thread is they are all running away from something.

Through a series of flashbacks, we learn more about the characters and their reasons for looking for an escape. The lady is on the run from loan sharks, something that appears too easily on Mediacorp dramas. The pianist wants to pursue his music dreams that are frowned upon by his father. The ex-convict is too ashamed to face his wife whom he once abused. While these back-stories are credible, it felt like revisiting beaten grounds. The film has not really uncovered new facets to old material that would allow me to say “I learnt something different about those Ah Beng loan-sharks”. More could have been explored to make these 3 stories feel less like tools to keep the engine of the main plot running. In crude terms, these three-in-ones or threesomes, if you like, are too conveniently used.

I cannot deny the story does have a hook that makes you want to watch on till almost the end. That I guess is where also the commercial value of the film would originate. We are kept in the dark about the reason behind the girl’s hysterics. Along the way, we are only fed soundbites of scenes from her past superimposed on sepia-toned headless figures – a rather awkward way to withhold identities. Still, when the truth was starting to unravel, there was a spine-tingling moment that justified the repetitive peek-a-boo flashbacks.

Despite his SBC/TCS/Mediacorp experience, the acting was not all formulaic and superficial. Aik Leong has somehow managed to milk some sincere and raw emotions from a number of his actors (not all). Nathaniel looks very comfortable in his role. Aunty Mary is a seasoned concoction of hysterics and gripping tension.

First-timer Sheila Sim puts in a credible though forgettable performance. The person who looks most uncomfortable in his role is the director himself, Aik Leong. But I suspect it was a personal challenge to himself to make a 180 degree turn in onscreen persona. But get your sense of fashion right… garish floral shirts are so yesterday! 

It seems my more benign comments are evened out by the bitchy ones, so how am I going to help you justify parting with your $18? Your mother. Give her something different to watch. An alternative to the channel 8 TV dramas. Something that even ends with a meaningful message. Aiya, if all else fails, just tell her Huang Yi Liang appears as an ‘Ah Kua’.

‘Autumn in March’ is available at several video stores islandwide. Alternatively, if you are lucky enough, you can buy directly from him. He is doing door-to-door of his Dvds. He has made 'appearances' in Bedok and Toa Payoh to date. I bought 2 Dvds because I support effort. So go grab yours too!

Check out 'Autumn in March' here.

Friday, November 6, 2009

A moment near the Causeway

Last Sunday, somewhere at the northern tip of Singapore (in Causeway Point), I had a little cinematic awakening. Perhaps it was the out-of-town feeling or the physical proximity to the Causeway, it made me very close to the subject matter of the film I was watching - 'Talentime'. 

Directed by the late Yasmin Ahmad, 'Talentime' brought the complexities and issues our Malaysian neighbours face to a place close to my heart. Writing about this film bends the rules of my blog but it is necessary because it sheds light on what we could be achieving in our own films. 

Is it her age or is it Malaysia's racial fabric that makes the drama so gripping? I know for sure racial harmony is a less within reach up north. Like Kahoe in 'Talentime', the Chinese forever hold on to some kind of Bumiputra-driven grudge. Between religions, there are lots of spoken and unspoken boundaries when it comes to courting and romance. These racial undercurrents are richly explored in Yasmin's repertoire of films. 

But in Singapore, race and religion have been scarcely dealt with in films. There is a difference between being a 'melting pot' city and just a 'fruitcake' as I would call it. I am only focussing on the core races because the expat or foreign-worker-type mixed relationships may be more transient, or they may have grown from exotic pursuits and desires. Do we really mix well? I find it hard to answer that question. being part of the majority race, it takes a while for me to notice that the delivery men and drivers are often Malay and Indians never really make it to Channel 5's stable of TV personalities. The last was Darryl David back in the 90s. My other question is do we talk about it? Or do we all just avoid these topics because the SFC film grants do not support films with sensitive issues? Up north, I know many have something to say and for some, film just happens to be the preferred medium. Here, it seems many just want to make a film and then think of what to say as a second step! 
Apparently, Yasmin started her film journey late, after spending the bulk of her time in advertising. Sometimes, as budding filmmaker myself, I don't know if age will kick me off the shelf or actually enrichen my understanding of the world and lead me to make that award-winning film when I turn 50. Yasmin has turned 51 but she has not won a major award and never will. However, what she left behind are priceless vignettes that teach us a thing or two about relationships in this part of the world - something that I assume comes with a maturity cultivated over time. 

I saw a video of Yasmin circulating on Facebook earlier this week. Coincidentally, it was straight after I had watched 'Talentime'. She mentioned one of the guiding aims in filmmaking for her is to be able to mix sambal and a host of other spices to make 'clear soup'. Looking at her films, I am sure she meant clear soup that is still burning and spicy. For her previous films, I find this quite contradictory because her characters and scenes often look hammed up. The difference with Talentime is this time, on top of the same dramatic excesses, there was something really burning inside for me. I have been working on a script on and off but have often been losing that 'axe to grind' as life distracts me in many ways. This has thrown that axe back to me. Hopefully, for many others here too - who have been wanting to say something but have been too afraid to.